Md. Wahid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46987 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2025 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== Md. Wahid Son of Md. Rashid village- Kharhara, Ps- Barahat, Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 48308 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2025 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== Md. Akku S/o Md. Sahabuddin @ Md. Sahbuddin R/o Vill- Kharhara, P.S.- Barahat, Distt- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 46987 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv.
For the State :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 48308 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv.
For the State :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.
2. In this case, the petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025 (G.R. 1715 of 2025) for the offence punishable under Sections-126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 140(2), 351(2) & 3/5 B.N.S.
3. As per FIR, the husband of the informant was kidnapped when he was going to Basukinath by the named accused persons for ransom.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46987 of 2025(4) dt.12-09-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as a matter of fact, the petitioner Md. Akku has taken advance from the victim and the impugned order itself shows that it were not the accused persons but it was the victim himself, who called the petitioner Md. Akku which establishes the false implication of the petitioners. He has also submitted that on exactly similar footing, co-accused Md. Akbar Roy has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 12.08.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 54051 of 2025.
5. Learned APP for the State Sri Shailendra Kumar though opposed the prayer for bail but fairly conceded that it was the victim, who called the petitioners.
6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025 (G.R. 1715 of 2025), subject to the condition that the petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T