Ashok Yadav @ Ashok Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45848 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- GOBARDHANA District- West Champaran ====================================================== ASHOK YADAV @ ASHOK KUMAR YADAV Son of Sitaram Yadav, Resident of Village - Khairwa Tola, Balua, P.S.- Gobardhana, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rai Mukesh Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Gobardhana P.S. Case No. 26 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. As per FIR, the petitioner has been given the order to his associates and they ransacked the entire premises, damaged the property and with an intention to finish the life of informant, Motin Mian and Janardhan Ray assaulted the victim brutally and caused several injury on the body of the victim. In the present case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he has exhorted the accused persons to assault the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45848 of 2019(2) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Gobardhana P.S. Case No. 26 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. Whenever the Police will call the petitioner for the purpose of interrogation/investigation, he would present himself, In case of failure on two consecutive dates without any valid reason, the prosecution will have liberty to make a prayer for cancellation of his bail before the court below.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T