← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48444/2019bail granted

Binod Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-05Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48444 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2018 Thana- SINDHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Binod Chaupal, aged about 46 years, Son of Chulhai Chaupal Resident of Village - Katasa, P.S.- Singhwara, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Iqbal Asif Niazi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 216 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, the alleged occurrence has taken place on 19.10.2018 but, the First Information Report has been lodged on 30.10.2018.

There is a delay of ten days in lodging the First Information Report without any explanation.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also the delay in lodging the First Information Report, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48444 of 2019(2) dt.05-08-2019 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-5, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 216 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T