Deepak Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4181 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2020 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== DEEPAK SINGH son of Mahendra Singh Resident of Village- Haripur, P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Gogri P.S. Case No. 345 of 2020 GR No. 2856 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable punishable under Section 30(a)/37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

38.25 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered from the house of petitioner and petitioner was apprehended on the spot.

It is submitted that no recovery has been made from conscious possession of this petitioner. The said house is in abandoned condition. Petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. Petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2020 having no criminal antecedent, as stated in para 3 of the petition.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4181 of 2021(2) dt.18-03-2021 2/2 Chargesheet has already been submitted.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner got clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge IInd-cum-Special Judge Excise, Khagaria in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 345 of 2020 GR No. 2856 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T