Raghu Nandan Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14059 of 2019 ====================================================== Raghu Nandan Das, Son of Late Dukha Das Resident of Village- Lakrikola, P.O.- Manjira, P.S.- Banka, District- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary Vetenary Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director Vetenary Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Regional Director Vetenary Department, Bhagalpur Region, Bhagalpur. 5.

The District Magistrate Banka.

6.

The District Animal Husbandary Officer Banka. 7.

The Sub- Divisional Animal Husbandary Officer Banka. 8.

The District Provident Fund Officer Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suman Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Abhoy Kumar Kashyap AC to GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-01-2021 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State is present.

The petitioner has approached this court for issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent to pay the pre and post retiral dues alongwith interest thereon and for other ancillary reliefs.

Learned counsel for the State submits that a supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 6 and 7 which is on record. From perusal of

Patna High Court CWJC No.14059 of 2019(3) dt.13-01-2021 2/2 the paragraph nos. 5, 6 and 7 of the supplementary counter affidavit, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner has already redressed. However, if the petitioner has any grievance with regard to non-payment of his retiral dues, he is directed to file a representation before the concerned authority with a certified copy of this order and the concerned authority would be obliged to consider the same within a period of 45 days of its filing and pass reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law.

It is made clear that the concerned authority would be personally liable for non-compliance of the order of this court within the stipulated period as aforesaid.

With this observation/direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U