Bimal Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4558 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Bimal Kumar, son of Late Raghunandan Mandal, resident of at Shivpuri, Ward No.13, P.O.- Saharsa Kachahari, P.S.- Saharsa Sadar, District- Saharsa.
2. Sangeeta Kumari, wife of Sunil Kumar, resident of Mohalla- Gangjala, Ward No. 18, Saharsa, P.S.+District- Saharsa.
3. Shobha Kumari, wife of Hira Prasad Singh, resident of Jagdambi Niwas, Gangjala, Saharsa, P.S.+District- Saharsa.
4. Ajay Kumar Jha, son of Shri Rajendra Jha, resident of Village+P..- Bargaon via Monguar, P.S.- Basnahi, District- Saharsa.
5. Raja Kumar Poddar, son of Tarni Prasad Poddar, resident of Haritarni Kunj, Gandhi Path, Ward No. 8, Saharsa, P.S.+District- Saharsa.
6. Brajendra Kumar, son of Shri Jhingur Das, resident of Balha, P.O.- Gadhia, P.S.- Bangaon via Saharsa Kachahari, District- Saharsa.
7. Usha Kumari, wife of Niranjan Choudhary resident of Sai Sadan, Vidyapati Nagar, Ward No.19, Saharsa, P.S.+District- Saharsa.
8. Ghanshyam Kumar, son of Jagdish Pandit, resident of Ranibagh, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa.
5. The District Education Officer, Saharsa.
6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar No. 1, SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 30-10-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievances of the petitioners have been redressed, hence, they do not wish to press the present petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed off as withdrawn.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U