Shiv Ratan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46150 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2019 Thana- FULKAHA District- Araria ====================================================== SHIV RATAN YADAV S/o Rajo Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav, R/o villageBhavanipur, Ward No. 05, P.S.- Fulkaha, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 61 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 342, 379, 448, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioner was found taking away the cattle of the informant and he was caught with the cattle. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier husband of informant has lodged the case with regard to similar type of allegation and this time also his wife has lodged the case. Admittedly there is a land dispute between the parties. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46150 of 2019(2) dt.26-07-2019 2/2 event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Araria in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 61 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T