Durga Nand Yadav @ Durganand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50440 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Durga Nand Yadav @ Durganand Yadav S/o Ravi Yadav R/o VillageKushmar, PS- Khutauna, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Yadav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pramod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025 dated 17.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 324(4), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ( in short ' B.N.S.') and under Section 27 of Arms Act.
3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that the FIR has been registered against nine named accused including the petitioner and ten others have been shown as unknown, the main allegation of causing firearm injury to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50440 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 informant's son is against co-accused, Pramod Yadav @ Bauna and co-accused Ajit Yadav and the name of this petitioner finds place in the first part of the FIR in which several persons have been named without revealing the specific role of the petitioner and others, however, in that first part of FIR, there is simple allegation of having committed marpit with the prosecution party. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been made accused mainly on account of being brother of the accused Ajit Yadav and he is a young person and has been languishing in jail since 01.05.2025 having fair and clean antecedent
4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner may be involved in some other criminal cases and that there is serious allegation against him.
6. Considering the aforesaid submissions and mainly the nature of allegation appearing against this petitioner, coupled with his fair and clean antecedent and his young age, this Court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50440 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 concerned Court in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025.
(Shailendra Singh, J) maynaz/- U T