Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33278 of 2015 (2) dt.22-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33278 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2014 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Pintu Yadav son of Kaushal Kishore Yadav @ Kaushal Yadav, R/o villageThatha, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
Petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 24.12.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32190 of 2014 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 03.03.2014 and the trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. There was no intention on the part of the petitioner to hurt the informant, as alleged, the petitioner has fired on Durgesh Yadav which accidentally hit the informant, to which the learned APP opposes.
Considering the aforesaid submissions and the period of detention of the petitioner above named, he is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33278 of 2015 (2) dt.22-07-2015 satisfaction of the learned 1st Asstt. Sessions Judge, Khagaria in Sessions Trial No. 218 of 2014 arising out of Mansi P.S. Case No. 16 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T