Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58657 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2021 Thana- SAHAJITPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

ASHOK KUMAR @ ASHOK BHAGAT Son of - Yogendra Bhagat Resident of Village - Sahajitpur, P.S.- Sahajitpur, Dist. - Saran at Chapra. 2.

RAMBHA DEVI Wife of - Yogendgra Bhagat Resident of Village - Sahajitpur, P.S.- Sahajitpur, Dist. - Saran at Chapra. 3.

SAMBHA DEVI wife of - Sambha Devi Resident of Village - Sahajitpur, P.S.- Sahajitpur, Dist. - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that during pendency of this application, petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have been arrested and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.

In view of the aforesaid submission, this application is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner nos. 1 and 2. So far as petitioner no. 3 is concerned, the instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by him apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case no. 30 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 308, 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution story relates to snatch the gold ring of the informant and chain of Rekha Devi and Lalmuni Devi.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58657 of 2021(3) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no allegation of assault against the petitioner. There is case and counter case. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 3 on bail. The petitioner no. 3 is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case no. 30 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U