Anil Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21701 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -421 Year- 2012 Thana -CHAKIA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Anil Sah S/o Late Ramdeo Sah Village - Puran Chapra, P.S. Chakia, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272,273,284,413,420,467,471 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code, section 47(a) of the Excise Act and section 43 of the Juvenile Justice(Care and Protection of Children) Act. Huge quantity of country made liquor were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had valid licence on the date of seizure. Statement to the aforesaid effect has been made in paragraph 7 of the petition. Statement has also been made in paragraph 3 of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21701 of 2014 (3) dt.04-02-2015 2/2 petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 421 of 2012 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Learned court below will accept the bail bond of the petitioner after verifying the fact that on the date of seizure the petitioner's liquor licence was valid.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anil/- U T