Sunil Sukla @ Sunil Shukla And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24007 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2016 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Sunil Sukla @ Sunil Shukla Son of Markandey Shukla
2. Nathuni Shukla Son of Late Awarika Shukla Both are resident of village - Sajjandihra, P.S. Kargahar, Disttrict - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuradha Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Kargahar P.S. Case No. 33 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 147,148,149,323,307,504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is evident from the First Information Report that the informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. It is not disclosed in the First Information Report as to how the informant learnt about the involvement of the petitioners in commission of the offence, he contends. It has also been submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. It has been stated in paragraph 3 of the application that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. In view of the submissions as above, this application is allowed.
Let petitioners above-named in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-2, Sasaram at Rohtas, in Kargahar P.S. case No. 33 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present themselves before the police/Court as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U