Sumitra Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.585 of 2017 In Civil Review No.75 of 2016 ====================================================== Sumitra Kumari, Wife of Ram Ayodhya Prasad, Resident of VillageRakashiya, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner/petitioner/Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector of the District -Patna.

4. The Block Development Officer, Dulhin Bazar, Patna

5. The District Education Superintendent, Patna.

6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Achhua Rakashiya, under Block-Dulhin Bazar, District-Patna.

7. The Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Raj, Achhua Rakashiya, under Block-Dulhin Bazar, District-Patna.

8. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Patna

9. Sangita Kumari, daughter of Late Ganpat Singh, Resident of VillageRakashiya, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District Patna, presently posted as Panchayat Teacher, in Primary School Rakashiya Musahari, within Dulhin Bazar Block in Patna District.

... ... Respondents/Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Nityanand, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey-AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 26-09-2018 The present Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred challenging the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting the review application.

As per the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bussa Overseas and Properties Private Limited and Another Versus Union of India and Another reported in (2016) 4, SCC 696 against the rejection of the review

Patna High Court LPA No.585 of 2017(8) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 application, the Letters Patent Appeal shall not be maintainable. Under the circumstances, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present Letters Patent Appeal with a view to take any other remedy which may be available to her challenging the original order passed in the main writ petition.

Permission is, accordingly, granted.

The present Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Mukesh R. Shah, CJ) (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Sunil/- U