Arbind Singh @ Munna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51183 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2022 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Arbind Singh @ Munna Singh S/O Late Ramdeo Singh R/O Maharana Pratap Colony, Dighi Kala, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, Distt-Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Chandni Kumari W/O Arbind Singh, D/O Dilip Kumar Presently residing at Village- Baijnathpur, P.O.- Birna Lakhan Sen, P.S- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jainendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 128 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 406, 498(A), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 12.11.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51183 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. He has submitted further that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2.

6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for OP No. 2 has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court of Smt. Ankita Jaiswal Judge-VII-cum-A.C.J.M.-V, Vaishali at Hajipur / concerned court below in connection with Complaint Case No. 128 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

8. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51183 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 failing which his bail bond shall liable to be cancelled. The interim maintenance will be subject to any other order granted by any other Court of competent jurisdiction granting maintenance to Opposite Party No. 2 (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T