Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11804/2018bail granted

Rohit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-27Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11804 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11804 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -105 Year- 2017 Thana -SUIYA District- BANKA ====================================================== Rohit Yadav Son of Baikunth Yadav Resident of Village- Dahibara, P.S. Chandan, District-Banka.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2017 in connection with Suiya P.S. Case No. 105/2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 25(1B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with alleged recovery of two live cartridges from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody since 18.09.2017 already suffered, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Suiya P.S.Case No. 105/2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11804 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T