Akhilesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54538 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Akhilesh Sah Son of Chatu Sah Resident of Vill- Amanpur, P.S.- Charaut, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Geeta Devi Wife of Ahilesh Sah Resident of Vill- Amanpur, P.S.- Charaut, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhavesh Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with C.R. Case No. 234 of 2021 for the offence under Sections 498A, 379 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute between the parties in which it is alleged against the petitioner that he demanded Rs. 2,00,000/- in cash and one motorcycle as dowry and due to nonfulfillment of same, she was subjected to torture variously.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the Complaint petition. The petitioner has falsely been implicated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54538 of 2024(6) dt.07-04-2025 2/2 in this case by the complainant only to pressurise the petitioner to live in the paternal house of the complainant.

5. In compliance of the order dated, 25.02.2025, complainant along with her husband is present in-person before the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the matter has now been settled amicably between the parties and the complainant is residing happily with her husband in her matrimonial home. Now, there is no dispute between them.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, and as the matter has been settled amicably between the parties, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the fate of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st, Benipatti, Madhubani, in connection with C.R. Case No. 234 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T