Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36346 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -328 Year- 2014 Thana -SAUR BAZAR District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh, Son of Dashrath Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Aini, Police Station- Simari Bakhtiyarpur, DistrictSaharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 16-03-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by the order dated 30.1.2015 passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. 39210 of 2014. Considering the period of custody and the undertaking of the elder brother of the Petitioner namely, Madan Singh @ Madan Singh Yadav, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Sri A. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 328 of 2014, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36346 of 2015 (2) dt.16-03-2016 2/2 Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T