Patna High CourtL.P.A/986/2014dismissed

Narayani Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-27Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.986 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1335 of 2014 =========================================================== Narayani Prasad son of Late Badri Narain Lal, resident of Mohalla- Laskariganj, P.O. and P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary to Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary to Govt., Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna

3. The Secretary to Govt., Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna

4. The Additional Secretary to Govt., Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna

5. The Joint Secretary to Govt., Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna

6. The Deputy Secretary to Govt., Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna

7. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram

8. The District Rural Development Agency, Rohtas through the Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas at Sasaram

9. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, D.R.D.A., Rohtas at Sasaram .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 27-04-2017 Heard counsel for the appellant and counsel for the State.

Since District Rural Development Agency (D.R.D.A.) is a registered society and does not have any attributes of a State and the employees of D.R.D.A. are not State Government or Central Government employees, the claim of the present appellant, which he

Patna High Court LPA No.986 of 2014 dt.27-04-2017 2/2 is making while assailing the order dated 28.03.2014, is a misplaced kind of expectation to have. The entitlement of the appellant will flow from the terms and conditions of the engagement by the said registered society and if the learned single Judge has dismissed the writ application taking note of such a situation he has committed no error of law whatsoever.

Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 28.04.2017 Transmission Date N/A