Ravi Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.318 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17405 of 2014 ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Kumar, Son of Late Sukhdeo Rai, Resident of village - Pachrukhi, Post + Police Station - Dandari, District - Begusarai ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The District Education Officer, Begusarai
4. The District Programme officer ( Establishment ), Begusarai
5. The Sub Divisional officer, District Begusarai
6. The Block Development officer, Dandari, District - Begusarai
7. The Block Education officer, Dandari, District Begusarai
8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bank, Block - Dandari, District - Begusarai
9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bank, Block - Dandari, District - Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 25-04-2018 Delay of 41 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 1197 of 2017 stands allowed and disposed of.
Considered the question of admission. Appellant wants to be appointed to the post in question based on the selection process and the counselling which was conducted earlier.
Patna High Court LPA No.318 of 2017 dt.25-04-2018 2/2 A perusal of the records indicates that the earlier process of selection and counselling was cancelled because of various infirmities and after inquiry the entire process of appointment through counselling was cancelled, thereafter when the new rules had come into force, due to coming into force of the new rules there is a requirement of the vacancy being filled up as per new rules.
Finding that petitioner cannot take advantage of the previous selection process which has been cancelled, the writ petition has been dismissed indicating various reasons in the matter. We also find no infirmity in the order passed by the learned Writ Court warranting reconsideration. The appeal is dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 01.05.2018 Transmission Date