Madhav Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47099 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- JIRADEI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Madhav Sah Son of Late Nathuni Sah Resident Of Village- Jamapur, PS -Ziradei, Dist- Siwan 2.
Raghav Sah @ Ragho Sah son of Late Nathuni Sah Resident Of VillageJamapur, PS -Ziradei, Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Ziradei P.S Case No. 35 of 2025, for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution story, petitioners and other co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant and her husband by means of lathi, danda. Co-accused namely, Pratima Devi caught her hair and started assaulting due to which she fell down and Sunita Devi snatched golden chain and nose pin from her. When her husband came to rescue, petitioner no. 1 assaulted to her husband by lathi causing injury on head. Petitioner no. 2 and co-accused Dharmendra Sah and Atul Sah assaulted with Lathi- danda.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47099 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Both the parties are co-villagers and there is a land dispute between the parties. The injury report mentioned in Annexure P/2 shows that the injured has sustained simple injury caused by hard and blunt object. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and also considering the fact that the injury is found to be simple in nature, let the petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Ziradei P.S Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T