Kishore Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11243 of 2024 ====================================================== Kishore Kumar Yadav Son of Naresh Yadav, Resident of Village- Tetaria, P.OKiyajori, P.S.- Chakai, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Eduction, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Jamui, District- Jamui. 5.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Jamui, District- Jamui. 6.

The District Education Officer, District- Jamui. 7.

The District Programme Officer (Estd), District- Jamui. 8.

The Block Development Officer, Chakai, District- Jamui. 9.

The Enquiry Officer-cum-Executive Magistrate, Jamui. 10.

Upendra Yadav Son of Yadunath Yadav Resident of Village- Tetaria, Gram Panchayat- Fariyatadih, P.S.- Chakia, District- Jamui. 11.

Sunil Kumar, Assistant Teacher Upgraded Middle School, Darbaiya, PostBanka, Panchayat- khoripanan, P.S.- Jasidih, District- Deoghar. 12.

Sunil Kumar, Incharge Headmaster, Middle School, Dhawatand, Fariatadih, Block- Chakai, District- Jamui.

... ... Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Government Pleader (7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application/representation on 24.05.2024 before the respondent no.8 but till date no action has been taken on his application.

3. In such view of the matter, I direct the petitioner to

Patna High Court CWJC No.11243 of 2024(2) dt.30-07-2024 2/2 file a fresh representation within two weeks before the respondent no.8 and respondent no.8 would be obliged to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

4. It is made clear that if the order is not complied within the stipulated period, as aforesaid, this Court may take serious view of the matter.

5. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U