← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46941/2019dismissed

Sony Naj v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-30Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46941 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2015 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== SONY NAJ Wife of Md. Mister Resident of Village- Motipur, P.S.- Rosra, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raja Ram Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rosra P.S.Case no.173 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 386, 506 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code having G.R.No.811 of 2015.

Allegation against the petitioner is that she thrashed the informant on the ground . It further appears that earlier she had been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge, vide order dated 24.9.2015 passed in A.B.P.No.1869 of 2015 but within time, she could not surrender and thereafter again filed A.B.P.no.577 of 2017, which was allowed, vide order dated 28.3.2017 with direction to surrender within one month but it appears that thereafter also she did not surrender and filed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46941 of 2019(2) dt.30-07-2019 2/2 application for grant of anticipatory bail, vide ABP No.1324 of 2019, which was dismissed by the impugned order. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to communication gap , she could not surrender but I failed to understand that one time it is acceptable that she could not appear but twice she has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail but she has not appeared, as such it appears that she has no respect of direction of the Court. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, she may surrender and pray for regular bail.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T