← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53219/2025bail granted

Subhas Rai @ Subhash Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-18Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53219 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-443 Year-2024 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== Subhas Rai @ Subhash Ray S/O Vakil Rai @ Late Vakil R/O VillageDostnagar Ply Factory, P.S- Maner, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Usha Kumari Singh, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 448, 380, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner, along with co-accused Dwarika Rai, is alleged to have assaulted brother of informant with Gadasa.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. There is case and counter-case between the parties. The present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53219 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/3 delay of 10 days and there is no plausible explanation for the same. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused person, namely Dwarika Rai, has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 04.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46038 of 2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner, claim based on parity, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Danapur in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 443 of 2024,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53219 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 3/3 subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T