Ramesh Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47515 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2023 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== SONU MANDAL @ SONU KUMAR S/O YOGENDRA MANDAL R/O MOHALLA- JHAKHRAHI, WARD NO. 26, TOWN AND PS. AND DIST. SUPAUL ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 49763 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2023 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== RAMESH MANDAL SON OF SONAI LAL MANDAL R/O-JHAKHRAHI, WARD NO. 26, TOWN AND P.S.-SUPAUL, DISTT.-SUPAUL ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 47515 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Murari Narain Chaudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narsingh Tanti (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 49763 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Murari Narain Chaudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 341, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47515 of 2023(2) dt.08-08-2023 2/3
3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the son of the informant namely, Ashish Kumar.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Except suspicion, there is no consistent evidence and no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order date 02.08.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46436 of 2023. They are languishing in judicial custody since 14.04.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47515 of 2023(2) dt.08-08-2023 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 265 of 2023.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T