Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34369 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2015 Thana -BIDUPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Rai, S/o Ramanand Rai, resident of Village Rajasan, P.S. Bidupur, District Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Usha Kumari Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.03.2015 in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 132 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 18.03.2015, the informant's daughter, namely, Rani Kumari, aged about 12 years at about 10.00 A.M., went to the Middle School, Pakauli, but she did not return to the house till evening. On enquiry, the informant knew that co-accused persons named in the FIR have kidnapped her daughter with bad intension. On question, the accused persons did not give satisfactory reply so this case has been lodged. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34369 of 2015 (3) dt.24-11-2015 2/2 petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2015 and the charge sheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering of the evidence against the petitioner. From perusal of paragraph no. 22 of the case diary, it is evident that the victim has admitted that she had left with the petitioner and got married in a temple. She has denied regarding any physical abuse.

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 132/2015. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T