Dr. Lalan Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6023 of 2017 =========================================================== Dr. Lalan Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Ramugrah Prasad Yadav, resident of Chota Telpa, Gandhi Chowk, P.S. Town Chapra, P.O. Chhapra, District - Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar New Secretariat, Patna.

2. Jai Prakash University, Chhapra through its Registrar.

3. The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chhapra.

4. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

5. The Secretary, Law Department-cum-Ex-Officio Member Secretary, the State Level Empowered Committee under Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011.

6. The Principal Secretary, the Education Department-cum-Chairman, the Department Level Empowered Committee under Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011.

7. Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Registrar.

8. The Vice Chancellor, Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

9. The Registrar, Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S. K. Verma and Mr. V. P. Shrivastava, Advocates For the State :

Mr. R.V.P.Singh, A.C. to G.A. XII =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State; J.P. University and B.R.A. Bihar University.

2. In view of the materials brought on record, the Court finds that the admitted dues have been paid to the petitioner. Further, there is no reply or rejoinder filed by the petitioner to the averments made in the counter affidavits filed on behalf of the respondents.

3. In view thereof, the writ petition having served its

Patna High Court CWJC No.6023 of 2017 dt.18-06-2018 2/2 purpose, stands disposed off.

4. However, if the petitioner still has any grievance with regard to any non payment of admitted dues, he shall be at liberty to file a detailed representation within four weeks from today before the appropriate authority, who shall consider and dispose off the same by passing a reasoned order within four weeks from the date of filing of such representation.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U