Md. Almin @ Aalmeen v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- Lokha District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Md. Almin @ Aalmeen Son of Md. Manjur Alam R/O Gangapatti, P.S - Laukaha, District - Supaul 2.

Md. Mustak @ Mohammad Mustak Son of Md. Iliyas R/O Gangapatti, P.S - Laukaha, District - Supaul 3.

Mohammad Firoz @ Md. Firoz S/O Late Ful Mohammad @ Late Md. Fulo R/O Gangapatti, P.S - Laukaha, District - Supaul 4.

Md. Israil Son of Late Md. Kalimuddin R/O Gangapatti, P.S - Laukaha, District - Supaul 5.

Md. Munna Mushtaque @ Munna Mushtaque Son of Late Md. Tahir R/O Gangapatti, P.S - Laukaha, District - Supaul 6.

Md. Mukarram @ Mohammad Mukram Son of Mohammad Manjur Alam R/O Gangapatti, P.S - Laukaha, District - Supaul 7.

Md. Mustakim Son of Md. Nijam @ Md. Lijam R/O Gangapatti, P.S - Laukaha, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Thakur Brajesh Singh, Advocate Mr. Zeyaul Hoda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025, registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 15(2), 121(2), 132, 109, 303(2), 324(4), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49714 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 2/3 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that during a protest over Md. Jahangir's death, a violent mob of villagers, incited by some individuals, attacked police personnel and vandalized a Dial-112 vehicle at Mohania Petrol Pump. The attackers, including 57 named persons and 200-250 unknown others, looted equipment and tried to assault the police.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that there is no specific allegation levelled against the petitioners, rather the allegation is general and omnibus in nature. From perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that petitioners were the members of the mob. No police personnel sustained any injury in the alleged occurrence. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 11.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56649 of 2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49714 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 3/3 let the petitioners, above named in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T