Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5974 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR @ ROHIT MEHTA Son of Bajrangi Praad Resident of Village-Arma, P.S.-Kajra, District-Lakhisarai at the present Village-Harijan Para Shivpur, P.S.-Charcha, District-Koriya, State-Chhattisgarh. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr.APP For the informant :

Mr.Rajiv Prashant, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant through virtual mode.

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. Further, counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 1 of the bail application. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. case No.29/2019 registered under Sections 354(A), 498(A), 313/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5974 of 2021(3) dt.06-09-2021 2/3 torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. So far offence under Section 313 of I.P.C. is concerned, in course of investigation same has not been found to be true. Rest of of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai (Mahila) P.S. case No.29/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5974 of 2021(3) dt.06-09-2021 3/3 Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T