Kapildeo Prasad v. The Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2728 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22448 of 2014 ====================================================== Kapildeo Prasad son of late Jago Prasad, resident of village Thali Bazar, P.S. Govindpur, Dist. Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation through its Managing Director, namely Shri Jawahar Prasad, Mauryalok Complex, Patna.

2. Shri Jawahar Prasad, Managing Director, Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation, Mauryalok complex, Patna.

3. Shri Shekhar Sinha, The Secretary, Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation, Mauryalok complex, Patna.

4. Shri Aditya Kumar Pandey, the Divisional Manager, Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation, Latehar, Jharkhand.

5. Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha, the Accounts officer, Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation, Mauryalok complex, Patna.

6. Shri Sunil Kumar, the Superintendent, Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation, Latehar, Jharkhand.

.... .... Opp.Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 14-12-2016 Heard Mr. Krishna Kant Singh for the petitioner and Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, the counsel representing the Bihar State Ware Housing Corporation and its officials ( for short 'the Corporation') .

A show cause after service is filed. Mr. Jha, referring to the statement made in the show cause as also the order dated 20.09.2016 (Annexure-A), states that the order passed on the writ petition has been complied with. It is further stated that aggrieved

Patna High Court MJC No.2728 of 2016 (4) dt.14-12-2016 2/2 by the said order, the petitioner has already filed a writ petition which is pending consideration. Mr. Singh appearing for the petitioner has not disputed the aforesaid contention. Seen thus, in my view, the present application does not merit further persuasion. It is, accordingly, dismissed. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U