Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22781/2018bail granted

Ramprasad Patel v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-18Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22781 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2016 Thana- MAINATAND District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ramprasad Patel Son of Late Chattu Patel @ Chhath Patel Resident of Village - Singhpur, P.S. - Mainatand, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyavrat Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-04-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mainatand P.S.Case No. 108 of 2016 registered under Sections 188 and 382/34 of the Indian penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation in brief is that accused persons including the petitioner, members of the MALE group, on the point of pistol, cut away standing crops worth Rs. 20,000/-.

Submission is that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and he is also not a member of Naxalite group and similarly situated other co-accused persons have been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 18876 of 2017, Cr. Misc. No. 20754 of 2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 41786 of 2017 and the petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22781 of 2018(2) dt.18-04-2018 2/2 Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely , Ramprasad Patel, is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 108 of 2016 with condition that one of the bailor must be his close family member. He shall not tamper with the evidence or not induce any witness. Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Arun Kumar, J) sujit/- U T