← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2649/2019disposed

Rajesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-08Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2649 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21107 of 2013 ====================================================== 1.

Rajesh Kumar Singh S/o Sri Madan Mohan Singh Resident of VillageBarua,PS. Dighwara,Dist.Saran(Chapra) 2.

Meera Kumari D/o Late Radha Mohan Tiwary Resident of Village and PO Bareja(Farusahi),PS. Daudpur,Dist.Saran (Chhapra) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mr. Deepak Kumar Chief Secretary,Govt. of Bihar Old Secretariat,Patna800001 3.

Mr. R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Department Human Resources Department,Govt. of Bihar,Old Secdretariat.

4.

Mr. Amir Subhani, Principal Secretary Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms,now know as Department of General Administration,Govt. of Bihar,Old Secretariat,Patna-800001 5.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Director Primary Education,Department of Human Resources Development,Govt. of Bihar,New Secretariat,Patna800001 6.

Mr. Kumar Ramanuj, Director Mass Education (Jan Siksha) Department of Human Resources Development,Govt. of Bihar,New Secretariat,Patna800001 7.

Mr. Subrat Kumar Sen District Magistrate/Collector,Saran at Chhapra. 8.

Mr. Jai Chandra Shrivastav, District Education Officer,Saran at Chhapra ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023 Heard the parties.

The present MJC has been preferred for compliance of order dated 21.04.2016 in CWJC No.21107 of 2013 by which decision was to be taken.

A show-cause on behalf of the Director, Mass

Patna High Court MJC No.2649 of 2019(3) dt.08-08-2023 2/2 Education is on record according to which the case of the petitioners stand rejected by a committee on 13.06.2020 on the ground that there is no record to show they have served continuously for three years.

If the petitioner so want can always agitate the matter. Accordingly, MJC No.2649 of 2019 is disposed of with aforesaid liberty.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan U