Anuj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.949 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -505 Year- 2017 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Anuj Kumar Singh Son of Awadhesh Singh R/o Village - Marhowrah, Baishya Toli, P.S. - Marhowrah, District - Saran. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sri Sadanand Paswan,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Saran at Chapra, in connection with Marhowrah Police Station Case No.505 of 2017 registered under Sections 323, 379, 506, 386, 467, 468, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
There was dispute relating to non-refund of the money and in the aforesaid background, the allegations for the referred offences of the Penal Code above is there. Submission is that there is no material to
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.949 of 2018 (2) dt.02-04-2018 substantiate that any forgery was done in any document or any forged document was produced in evidence. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T