Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8429/2021rejected

Prameshar Yadav @ Parmeshwar Yadav @ Petrol Yadav @ Petrolwa v. The State Of Bihar

2021-05-26Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8429 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2019 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== PRAMESHAR YADAV @ PARMESHWAR YADAV @ PETROL YADAV @ PETROLWA S/o BHOLA YADAV Resident of Village - Kakardhov, P.S. - Laukahi, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Kumari Shubham :

Mr.Manish Kumar No. 13 :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti :

Ms.Nitu Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rohit Kumar :

Ms.Gulnar Begum (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2021 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Laukahi P.S. Case No. 208 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. No. 1635 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner had earlier approached this Court for grant of regular bail which was rejected by an order dated 03.06.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16215 of 2020. This

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8429 of 2021(5) dt.26-05-2021 2/2 application has been filed for renewing his application for regular bail.

According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner had snatched a sum of Rs. 40,000/- from the informant and had shot at him causing firearm injury in his left thigh. Considering direct allegation of assault made by firearm leading to injury and the petitioner's criminal antecedent his application was earlier rejected. The petitioner has criminal antecedent, as is evident from paragraph 3 of the application. Considering the gravity of the offence and the petitioner's alleged involvement in other criminal cases, as noted above, I am not inclined to grant him privilege of regular bail for the present.

This application is accordingly rejected.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) AKASH/- U T