Ravi Chaudhary @ Ravi Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49634 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-372 Year-2023 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== RAVI CHAUDHARY @ RAVI CHAUDHARI SON OF CHIRKUT CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- MOHANIA WARD NO. 16, PS- MOHANIA, DIST- KAIMUR (BHABUA) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Sunil For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No.372 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b), 29 of the NDPS Act.

3. Allegedly, one person namely, Asif Rain was apprehended by the police with 48.950 gms of heroin like substance, Rs.7100 and one mobile phone. He disclosed the name of the petitioner that he used to give the seized substance for selling and they get the profit in equal proposition.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49634 of 2023(3) dt.25-08-2023 2/2 levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner transpired in the present case only on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T