← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52009/2023allowed

Ritesh Yadav @ Jatta Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-31Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52009 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2023 Thana- NARAINPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RITESH YADAV @ JATTA YADAV SON OF SACHIT YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHOBRI, PS- NARAYANPUR, DIST- BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Today learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit in Court.

3. Let it be kept on record.

4. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 506, 354 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. The petitioner in association of other co-accused armed with deadly weapon is said to have resorted firing and assaulted the informant.

6. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. It is further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52009 of 2023(2) dt.31-08-2023 2/2 submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. It is further submitted that although there is allegation of resorting firing but none has sustained any firearm injury The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Petitioner has two criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit.

7. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 33 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T