Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48309 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- MAIGRA District- Gaya ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar, Son of Late Ashok Singh, Resident of Village - Karmaun, P.S.- Imamganj, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2025 Heard Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Amitesh Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that one person riding on a bike was coming towards Imamganj road tried to flee away on seeing the informant but he was apprehended with the help of police force. Further case of the prosecution is that the petitioner failed to produce valid paper of the alleged bike bearing registration no. JH02A693 and he disclosed that the bike is stolen one.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48309 of 2025(2) dt.08-08-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the bike which has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner was handed over to him by Amit Kumar. It has also been submitted that there is no one to complain about the theft of the bike. It has also been submitted that petitioner has been framed in this case because he is having criminal antecedent of one case of similar nature. He is in judicial custody since 21.05.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sherghati, District-Gaya, in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T