← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47727/2025bail rejected

Udit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47727 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Udit Yadav S/o Rambriksha Yadav R/o Village- Babhnagari, PS- Rahika, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 30(f), 33 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, 12 litres illicit Indian made foreign liquor was recovered from an orchard.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. The alleged illicit liquor has been recovered from an open place,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47727 of 2025(2) dt.21-07-2025 2/2 which is accessible to one and all.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that huge quantity of illicit liquor was recovered from the spot. Petitioner has got two criminal antecedents of similar nature.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, recovery of huge quantity of illicit liquor and the fact that petitioner has got two criminal antecedents of similar nature, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T