Khushboo Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5265 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== KHUSHBOO DEVI (Female), aged about 25 years, Sex-Female, W/o Raju Ray Resident of Village - Ajimchak, P.S.- Gaurichak, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Ramji Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :
Mr. A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through Virtual mode.
The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 504 and 506/34 of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is the sister-in-law (Gotani) of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5265 of 2021(2) dt.07-04-2021 2/2 the victim. She is separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. She has got no concern with the alleged occurrence. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Madhavi Singh, Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Patna, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 100/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T