Ripunjay Kumar @ Mulayam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45849 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2018 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Ripunjay Kumar @ Mulayam Son of Kaushal Kishore Singh, Resident of Village-Rame Kahuara P.S.-Nardiganj, District-Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 151 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 363, 365 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per FIR, the victim girl is a Teacher in a school. Allegation has been made to have kidnapped the victim. The victim in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.PC, has stated that she had gone to Ranchi without giving any information to her parents and she stayed with the Bhabhi of Ripunjay Kumar and when she could know about the lodging of the case, she came from where and went to her house. The age of victim in 164 Cr. PC. statement has been shown as 17
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45849 of 2019(2) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 years.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 151 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. Whenever the Police will call the petitioner for the purpose of interrogation/investigation, he would present himself, In case of failure on two consecutive dates without any valid reason, the prosecution will have liberty to make a prayer for cancellation of his bail before the court below.