Dr. Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12274 of 2016 ====================================================== Dr. Arun Kumar, son of Ram Dahin Prasad, resident of Mohalla Indira Nagar Road No. 9, P.S- Jakkanpur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, C.B.I. New Delhi.
4. The Director, Vigilance, Patna.
5. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.
6. The S.P. Samastipur.
7. The B.D.O. Patory, Samastipur.
8. The B.E.E.O. Patory, Samastipur.
9. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Darba, Block- Patory, Samastipur.
10. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Block- Patory, Samastipur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Lalit Kishore, PAAG-1 For the CBI : Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha, S.C.,CBI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-09-2016 Heard Mr.
Dhananjay Mishra, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned PAAG No.1, appearing for the respondent-State. Heard also Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for the respondent-CBI.
Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in
Patna High Court CWJC No.12274 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016 2/2 future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U