Sarika Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12065 of 2023 ====================================================== Sarika Kumari W/o Sri Santosh Kumar, resident of Ward no. 04 Hariharpatti, Ganjharmal, P.O. and P.S.-Triveniganj, District-Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director I.C.D.S., Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate-cum-District Collector-cum-District Officer, Supaul. 5.

The District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S.), Supaul. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Triveniganj, District Supaul. 7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Triveniganj, District Supaul. 8.

The Concerned Female Supervisor, Triveniganj, District Supaul. 9.

Usha Devi W/o Dilip Mandal, resident of Gajharmal Ward No. 4, Hariharpatti, P.S.-Triveniganj, District-Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Raisul Haque ( SC-10 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.A) To issue a writ in nature of Certiorari setting aside the order dated 01.03.2023 passed in Anganbari Appeal Case No. 34/2021 passed by District Collector, Supaul whereby and whereunder he found claim of Respondent No.9, not in

Patna High Court CWJC No.12065 of 2023(2) dt.19-02-2024 2/2 accordance with guidelines of selecting and approved the order of dismissal by District Programme Officer I.C.D.S., Supaul, but he did not stop there and went ahead setting aside selection of petitioner thus, partially setting aside order dated 24.03.2020 passed in Anganbari Case No. 15/2018."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U