Ram Parikha Ahir @ Ram Pariksha Ahir And ANR v. State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.97 of 2006 Arising Out of PS.Case No. 400 Year- 1984 Thana -null District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ===========================================================

1. Ram Parikha Ahir @ Ram Pariksha Ahir son of Haridwar Ahir

2. Ram Dahin Ahir son of Haridwar Ahir, both are resident of village Kurari, P.S. Durgawati, District Kaimur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-08-2015 The Petitioners seek revision of the judgment of conviction dated 8.6.1988 passed by the court of Sri R.S. Pandey, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Bhabua in Trial No.462 of 1988 (G.R. No.400 of 1984), by which he has convicted and sentenced the Petitioners to 2 years 6 months R.I. under Arms Act and one year under Section 324/34 I.P.C., which was affirmed by judgment dated 13.9.2005 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Kaimur in Criminal Revision No.220 of 1988/16 of 2001.

On going through the impugned judgment, I do not find any irregularity in the same. However, considering the date of occurrence, the sentence is modified to the period already undergone by them.

With the aforesaid modification in sentence, the revision application stands dismissed.

Narendra/- (Anjana Prakash, J) U T