Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50145 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

VIKASH KUMAR Son of Sanjay Paswan Resident of Village - Ahiasha, P.s.- Ghoshi, Distt.- Jehanabad.

2.

Kamlesh Kumar Son of Sanjay Paswan Resident of Village - Ahiasha, P.s.- Ghoshi, Distt.- Jehanabad.

3.

Viswkarma Kumar Son of Sanjay Paswan Resident of Village - Ahiasha, P.s.- Ghoshi, Distt.- Jehanabad.

4.

Sanjay Paswan Son of Late Vindeshwar Paswan Resident of Village - Ahiasha, P.s.- Ghoshi, Distt.- Jehanabad.

5.

Balindra Paswan Son of Late Vindeshwar Paswan Resident of Village - Ahiasha, P.s.- Ghoshi, Distt.- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 324, 326, 307 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all the FIR named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted the informant and his family members as a result of which informant and his family

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50145 of 2022(8) dt.04-07-2023 2/2 members sustained injuries.

It is submitted that there is land dispute between the parties and on account of that simple Mar-pit took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. The injuries sustained by the informant and his family members are found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Ghoshi PS case No. 197/ 2021, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T