Vivek Kumar Ranjan @ Vivek Kumar @ Monu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1818 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== Vivek Kumar Ranjan @ Vivek Kumar @ Monu Son of Vijay Singh resident of Village - Chitaur Nagar, P.S. - Aurangabad, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Sahabad Range, Rohtas at Sasaram.

5. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.

7. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Dehri, Rohtas at Sasaram.

8. The Station Head Officer of Mahila Thana, Rohtas at Sasaram.

9. The Investigating Officer of the Case Mahila Thana Rohtas at Sasaram.

10. Kumari Rashmi Singh D/o Madan Singh R/o Maninagar (Jakibigha), P.S. - Dehri, District - Rohtas.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Parth Sarthi(Ga4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 While the petitioner is seeking quashing of the first information report, learned counsel for the State submits that now the investigation is complete in the matter and a chargesheet has already been submitted vide Charge-sheet No. 91 of 2017 dated 31.10.2017.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, this writ application has become infructuous. In case the cognizance is taken on the basis of charge-sheet, the petitioner will be at liberty to seek his remedy in accordance with law.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1818 of 2017(2) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 This application stands disposed off.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U