Patna High CourtCWJC/12053/2017disposed

Soni Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-25Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12053 of 2017 ====================================================== Soni Devi, Aged about 30 years, wife of Bhairab Yadav, Resident of VillageJurauna, Police Station- Kuseshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

3. The District Education Officer, Darbhanga.

4. The District Programme Officer, Prarambhik Education & Serve Shiksha Abhiyan, Bihar Shiksha Pariyojna, Darbhanga.

5. The Block Education Officer, Kusheshwar Asthan (East), P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga.

6. Sri Dhanesh Chaupal, The Headmaster Upgraded Middle School, Jurauna, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga.

7. Sri Padma Bhushan Prasad (C.R.C.C.), Supervisor of Vidyalaya Shiksha Samiti, Upgraded Middle School Jurauna, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, DistrictDarbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Prasad For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh -GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 The dispute relates to reconstitution of Vidyalaya Shiksha Samiti of upgraded Middle School, Jurauna. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even otherwise, he has alternative statutory remedy available under Bihar Anudani Sikshan Sansthan Pradhikar constituted under Anudanit Shikshan Sansthan Pradhikar Niyamawali, 2015 for the relief which the petitioner is seeking in the present writ application.

In that view of the matter, this application is disposed

Patna High Court CWJC No.12053 of 2017(2) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail the said statutory remedy. It is indicated that if the petitioner's application is found to be barred by limitation, Pradhikar is expected to take into account the period spent by the petitioner in pursuing this matter before this Court.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) arun/- U