Raju Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49320 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2017 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

RAJU RAJAK S/o Late Shankar Rajak R/o village- Ulao, Sharma Tola, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.), District- Begusarai 2.

Chandan Rajak S/o Late Shankar Rajak R/o village- Ulao, Sharma Tola, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.), District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 323, 307, 379, 385, 354, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that on orders of petitioner No. 2, the petitioner No. 1 assaulted him with an Iron Khanti causing injury on head, the accused persons also assaulted his sister causing injury on head and misbehaved with her, it is next alleged that Kakku snatched Mangalsutra of Mita Devi, further, Dilip and Kakku also demanded extortion of Rs. 50,000/-.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49320 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioner No. 2 has been implicated on the allegation that he was an order giver and petitioner No. 1 is said to have assaulted by Iron Khanti causing injury on head of the informant. It is next submitted that the occurrence took place on account of dispute relating to land, it is further submitted that even injuries suffered by the injured are simple in nature caused by a hard and blunt substance which further belies the allegation of assault by Khanti.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 239 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T