Raghu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50966 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2021 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAGHU CHAUDHARY Son of Arun Kumar Chaudhary Resident of Village - Inarva , P.s.- Khajauli, Distt.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per prosecution story, four miscreants on two motorcycle looted Rs. 5,98,200/- from a vehicle which was returning to the office after collecting the money belonging to a Private Limited Company. The name of the petitioner transpired as on of the accused persons during investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Neither the petitioner has been put on T.I.P. nor anything incriminating has been recovered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50966 of 2022(3) dt.12-01-2023 2/2 from his conscious possession. Even during investigation, no substantive material has come up against the petitioner showing his involvement in the alleged occurrence. Similarly situated coaccused namely, Sonu Kumar has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 27.9.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 69477 of 2021. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.2.2022. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 57 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Madhubani. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T