Pradeep Kumar Bharti And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18759 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Pradeep Kumar Bharti, Son of Binod Kumar Mandal, Resident of VillageLakshminiya, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
2. Uttam Prakash Mishra, Son of Krityanand Mishra, Resident of Village- Sonamukhi, P.S.- Kishanpur Ratawara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
3. Ramesh Kumar, Son of Shukhdeo Mandal, Resident of Village- Gangapur Paura Tola, P.S.- Kishanpur Ratawara, Block- Alam Nagar, District- Madhepura.
4. Sarwan Kumar Singh, Son of Sita Ram Singh, Resident of Village- Gangapur Paura Tola, P.S. Kishanpur, Ratawara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
5. Bashdeo Prasad Singh, Son of Bhagwan Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Gouchi Korchakka, P.S. & Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
6. Ram Singh, Son of Ramswarup Singh, R/o Village- Gangapur Bharsho Tola, P.S.- Kishanpur Ratawara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
7. Ashok Kumar Singh, son of Gaivi Singh, R/o Village- Khurhanmal, P.S. + BlockAlamnagar, District- Madhepura.
8. Dhanik Prasad Sharma, Son of Basu Prasad Sharma, R/o Village- Keshopur, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
9. Raman Kumar Raman, Son of Sita Ram Singh, R/o Village- Ashik Tola, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
10. Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Son of Kamleshwari Gupta, R/o village- Teliyari, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
11. Ramdeo Mandal, Son of Babu Lal Mandal, R/o Village- Chhatauna Tola, P.S. Kishanpur Ratwara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura
12. Sudhir Kumar Singh, Son of Ganga Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Parel, Kapsiya Tola, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
13. Murari Prasad Sah, Son of Shovani Sah, R/o Village- Pachbira Basa (Khapur), P.S.- Kishanpur Ratwara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
14. Sandip Kumar, Son of Nawal Kishor Prasad, R/o Village- Dhalha, P.S. + BlockAlamnagar, District- Madhepura.
15. Nutan Kumar, Wife of Anil Kumar Singh, R/o Village- Mahamuda, P.S. + BlockAlamnagar, District- Madhepura
16. Jai Prakash Mandal, Son of Narayan Mandal, R/o Village- Ganesh Mandal Tola, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
17. Shankar Mandal, Son of Maheshwar Mandal, R/o Village- Ganesh Mandal Tola, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura
18. Rajendra Kumar Mandal, son of Chhote Lal Mandal, r/o Village- Bajraha, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
Patna High Court CWJC No.18759 of 2017(2) dt.18-12-2018 2/3
19. Ambuj Kumar, Son of Mahanand Yadav, Resident of Village- Narthua, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
20. Chandrakant Singh, Son of Prabhakar Prasad Singh, Resident of village- Tilakpur, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
21. Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Son of Guneshwar Yadav, Residetn of Village- Lauka, P.S. + Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
22. Sunil Kumar Singh, Son of Jichho Singh , Resident of Village- Gangapur Bharso Tola, P.S.- Kishanpur, Ratwara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura.
23. Sikandar Paswan, Son of Nageshwar Paswan, Resident of Village- Khapur, P.S.- Kishanpura Ratwara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura
24. Mrityunjay Kumar, Son of Dhiraj Yadav, Resident of Village- Khapur P.S.- Kishanpur Ratwara, Block- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Patna.
3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Md. Qumrul Hoda, Advocate For the Respondents :
Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-12-2018 Petitioners' counsel submits that claim of the petitioners and the grounds raised by them are similar to the case of Prafful Kumar Mandal vs. the State of Bihar and others in C.W.J.C.No. 1109 of 2017. Order dated 19.9.2018, passed in said case covers issues involved in the present case. He submits that under similar circumstances, this Court vide order dated 19.9.2018, passed in another similar matter bearing C.W.J.C.No. 13677 of 2016 has directed the authorities to examine the issue and in case the same is found covered by the case of the Prafful
Patna High Court CWJC No.18759 of 2017(2) dt.18-12-2018 3/3 Kumar Mandal then the petitioners therein are to be extended the similar benefits. He submits that if a similar order is passed , petitioners' grievances are likely to be redressed. In view of limited nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of with the same observation. Authorities should examine claim of the petitioners and if it is "covered matter" with that of C.W.J.C.No. 1109 of 2017, the authorities would be obliged to extend the same benefit taking into considerations their own Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011, and more specifically Clause 4(C)(1) thereof.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi U