Vivek Kumar Verma @ Vivek Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50830 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2024 Thana- KOTWALI District- Munger ====================================================== Vivek Kumar Verma @ Vivek Verma Son of Late Ashok Kumar Verma @ Ashok Verma Resident of Mohalla - Kaura Maidan (Dhobi Tola), Gadhiya Gali, Police Station - Kasim Bazar, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 279 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 118(2), 111, 61 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

The informant alleged that on 02.09.2024 around 9 PM, about twenty accused persons, including petitioner, came and surrounded him near 'Tilak Maidan', assaulted him with weapons, and caused serious injuries. Later, they allegedly fired at his house after the incident.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50830 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is in custody since 12-03-2025. Petitioner bears six criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. So far as allegation against the petitioner is concerned, it is alleged that petitioner has assaulted by means of pistol but, but injury is found to be simple in nature. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, nature of accusation and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 279 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50830 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T