Rupesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47947 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2025 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger ====================================================== Rupesh Kumar, S/o Dileep Kumar, R/o vill - Kali Sthan Maksuspur, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, Distt.- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deep Anshuman, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner who apprehends arrest in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 261 of 2025 lodged on 06.09.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 127(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against five unknown accused persons having allegations that those persons have snatched the vehicle of informant and made open fire at the street. The accused persons have also taken PAN Card, AADHAAR Card, Driving License and cash amount of Rs. 350/- from the pocket of informant.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47947 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. In this case, FIR has been lodged against five unknown accused persons and the name of this petitioner has surfaced by virtue of confessional statement of co-accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there are two cases filed against the petitioner on the same day in which his name has come only on the basis of confession and except these two cases, the antecedent of the petitioner is clean. Learned counsel also submits that even after confession, nothing indiscriminatory has been recovered from his conscious physical possession and no T.I.P. has been conducted till date.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail but fairly submits that prior to these two cases lodged against the petitioner, he has got clean antecedent.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only), as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with the aforementioned case, subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47947 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U T